The meeting had the following agenda for the discussions:
Numerical ocean modeling is a relatively new field in science, at least in Norway. After the algae incident the summer of 1988, where thousands of tons of salmon were lost, the marine science community in Norway got funding to develop a model for the prediction of such algae blooms. The Norwegian industry also was interested in ocean modeling, and funded a large model intercomparison project, MOMOP, to find the model best suited for the challenging Norwegian waters.
The model that came best out of the intercomparison was the Princeton Ocean Model, and this model became the most widely used model in Norway, and probably still is.
Jarle used this model for some years when he was working at the Institute of Marine Research in Bergen (IMR), but after he became appointed a professor in applied mathematics at UiB, he started developing the Bergen Ocean Model together with people from IMR and the university. Having a track record in producing technical software for numerical integration and acoustics he saw there was clearly room for taking new and more advanced numerical methods into oceanography.
The list of publications reflects most of these activities.
The discussion went on topics such as internal pressure, the choice of vertical coordinate system and time-stepping techniques. The conclusion was that the problems we have encountered using BOM are of fundamental character, and are not necessarily avoided by choosing a different model concept. Choosing a layered/isopycnal model solves the internal pressure headache, but gives resolution problems near surface and bottom. Using finite element models gives very flexible handling of irregular geometries, but current freely available models have problems with conservation. On the question of implicit versus explicit time-stepping of surface gravity waves it was disccussed whether or not one can expect a truly consistant solution using mode-splitting. Practice has shown that mode-splitting seem to be the winner for problems where tidal effects are important.
On the development front, BOM 2.0 will be readied and released early 2001. New features are the improved Coriolis averaging technique due to Berntsen & Espelid, an option to use Stelling-Van Kester type internal pressure scheme, an option to use a Superbee-limiter scheme for advection of momentum (and other scalars), some optimization and the introduction of OpenMP directives for more efficient execution on SMP machines. A parallel version using MPI (improved scalability) will also probably be available in 2001.
Jarle was also telling about a long time project on diving the outlet of a river in a fjord to increase the primary production. Physical experiments are about to be started, just avaiting funding for some tubes...
The meeting was ended with a very nice dinner at Singer's!
Written by Helge Avlesen <avle @ ii.uib.no>